Legal Opinion

Rickard v. City of Reno

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1955No. 3859PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

Appellant, Adele Olga Rickard, plaintiff below, sued the City of Reno and the other respondents for damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall on the sidewalk in the City of Reno. At the close of plaintiff’s case the defendant city moved for a dismissal on the ground that plaintiff had failed to prove a sufficient case for the court or jury. Rule 41(b) N.R.C.P. The court granted the motion and dismissed the jury, holding that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. Appellant contends that the minds of reasonable men could well differ as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Dayton v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Richards v. VermilyeaNevada Supreme Court · 1918
  3. City of Las Vegas v. SchultzNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  4. City of Paducah v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. City of Louisville v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gunlock v. New Frontier Hotel Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wagon Wheel Saloon & Gambling Hall, Inc. v. MavroganNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Worth v. ReedNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Eggers v. Harrah's Club, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Griffin v. Rockwell International, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API