Rickard v. City of Reno
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, J.:
Appellant, Adele Olga Rickard, plaintiff below, sued the City of Reno and the other respondents for damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall on the sidewalk in the City of Reno. At the close of plaintiff’s case the defendant city moved for a dismissal on the ground that plaintiff had failed to prove a sufficient case for the court or jury. Rule 41(b) N.R.C.P. The court granted the motion and dismissed the jury, holding that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. Appellant contends that the minds of reasonable men could well differ as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Dayton v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Richards v. VermilyeaNevada Supreme Court · 1918
- City of Las Vegas v. SchultzNevada Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Paducah v. McManusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- City of Louisville v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gunlock v. New Frontier Hotel Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Wagon Wheel Saloon & Gambling Hall, Inc. v. MavroganNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Worth v. ReedNevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Eggers v. Harrah's Club, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Griffin v. Rockwell International, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.