State v. Kirk Murray Charlson
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtW. Jones, Justice
I. Nature of the Case
Kirk Charlson (“Charlson”) appeals from his conviction and subsequent withheld judgment for felony driving under the influence. Before the trial, Charlson filed a motion to suppress the results of an evidentiary blood draw that was conducted without a warrant. The district court denied the motion, and Charlson was convicted of felony driving under the influence after a jury trial in the Fourth Judicial District. Charlson appeals the denial of his motion to suppress the results of the evidentiary blood draw on the grounds that the draw violated his Fourth Amendment rights.
I…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HoerleNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BoydSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- BYRON MCGRAW v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- State v. PoolIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.