Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lord

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 13, 1978No. 78-1127PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECKER, Senior District Judge.

In this class action litigation petitioners pray for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent (1) to limit an order of the respondent district judge, certifying a national plaintiff class, (2) “compelling” the respondent to limit to Minnesota and set a cut-off date for the class conditionally, and (3) to vacate an order permitting the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to intervene in the action.

The petitioners are defendants in the civil action pending before the respondent United States District Judge in the Fourth Division of the United States…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Paxton v. Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. J.D. v. Alex Azar, IICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Lanner v. WimmerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  4. Duncan v. TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979
  5. Frazier v. PJ Iowa, L.C.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API