Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Greathouse v. Heed

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from tbe second judicial district, Ada county. Action commenced in tbe district court upon a promissory note for tbe recovery of a sum witbin tbe jurisdiction of tbe probate court. Tbe plaintiff bad judgment.

1ConcurrenceWhitsoN, J.

Noggle, O. J., dissented.

This case is brought here from tbe district court of Ada county, and the question pointed out for consideration is this: Does tbe act of congress of tbe thirteenth of December, 1870, confer exclusive jurisdiction in all civil cases when tbe amount in controversy does not exceed tbe sum of ñve hundred dollars, exclusive of interest, upon tbe probate court of tbe territory ?

Tbe act is as follows: “That probate courts of tbe territory of Idaho in their respective counties, in addition to their probate jurisdiction, be and they are hereby authorized to bear and determine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Courtwright v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Sterritt v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Wood v. Independent School District No. 2Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Rural High School District No. 1 v. School District No. 37Idaho Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State ex rel. Canyon County v. ForchIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API