Portnoy v. Portnoy
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
The appeal presents one question: May a former wife, who has obtained a final ex parte California divorce, thereafter maintain an action for support in this state against her former husband ? The lower court held that she could, and awarded support. We affirm.
In resolving the question we may, of course, put to one side those cases in which the wife has had an opportunity to claim support or alimony, for in such cases there may be reason to limit her rights against the husband to what the divorce court has granted. See Herrick v. Herrick, 55 Nev. 59, 25 P.2d…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kelley v. KelleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hudson v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fulwider v. FulwiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Cavell v. CavellNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Cavell v. CavellNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Portnoy v. PortnoyNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Walker v. WalkerNevada Supreme Court · 1968