Legal Opinion
Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 21, 1988No. Civ. A. 85-6166PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
O’NEILL, District Judge.
AMI brought this action asserting federal and state law claims against IBM, 1 which filed several counterclaims. 2 The parties agreed to try the liability aspect of AMI’s claim under Section 1 of the Sherman Act 3 separately. AMI’s claim has two parts: 4 AMI alleges that IBM’s net pricing policy constitutes an unlawful tying arrangement and that IBM’s Installation and Warranty Service Charge constitutes an unreasonable restraint of trade. The issues were tried before me non-jury; 5 this memorandum constitutes my findings of fact and conclusions of law. See…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. QuiggCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Lilly v. Harris-Teeter SupermarketCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. QuiggCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.