Eckert v. Truman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
After entry of judgment the judgment debtor may appeal by another attorney without any substitution. (Lusk v. Hastings, 1 Hill, 656; Cruikshank v. Goodwin, 20 N. Y. Supp. 757; Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695.) Mr. White’s authority to represent Mrs. Truman in these proceedings had since the judgment, stands undisputed by Mr. Davenport, the former attorney of record. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal and to set aside the other proceedings taken in behalf of the appellant is denied, but without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ .
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. SolomonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Cruikshank v. GoodwinNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shaw v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gradl v. SaulpaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944