Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. FRANK JAMES SHERIDAN

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2015No. SD33381PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, P.J.

A jury found that Frank James Sheridan (“Defendant”), either “acting alone or in concert with another,” had committed the class B felony of attempting to manufacture methamphetamine “on or about December 31, 2011[.]” See section 195.211. 1 Defendant claims he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court

abused its discretion in permitting testimony and photos relating to stolen four-wheelers[ 2 ] found at the property in question, because this testimony violated [Defendant’s rights to due process and to be tried only for the crime with which he was charged ... in that this evidence had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HornbuckleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State v. VorheesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. State v. HoweryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State of Missouri v. Bradley IseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Amanda N. BazellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. State v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API