STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. FRANK JAMES SHERIDAN
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, P.J.
A jury found that Frank James Sheridan (“Defendant”), either “acting alone or in concert with another,” had committed the class B felony of attempting to manufacture methamphetamine “on or about December 31, 2011[.]” See section 195.211. 1 Defendant claims he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court
abused its discretion in permitting testimony and photos relating to stolen four-wheelers[ 2 ] found at the property in question, because this testimony violated [Defendant’s rights to due process and to be tried only for the crime with which he was charged ... in that this evidence had…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HornbuckleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State v. VorheesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- State v. HoweryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State of Missouri v. Bradley IseMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Amanda N. BazellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- State v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018