Legal Opinion

Education Initiative PAC v. Committee to Protect Nevada Jobs

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2013No. 61996PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

In this appeal, we consider the proper standard of review to be applied when reviewing the adequacy of a ballot initiative’s description of effect. Nevada’s Constitution permits the Legislature to provide procedures to facilitate the initiative process. In 2005, the Legislature enacted NRS 295.009(l)(b), which requires a ballot initiative to provide in 200 words or less a description of the effect of the initiative. A description of effect serves a limited purpose to facilitate the initiative process, and to that end, it must be a straightforward, succinct,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Campbell v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Herbst Gaming, Inc. v. Sec'y of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Stumpf v. LauNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Nevadans for Nevada v. BeersNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Nevada Judges Ass'n v. LauNevada Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. ED. FREEDOM PAC v. REID (BALLOT ISSUE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  2. HELTON v. NEV. VOTERS FIRST PAC (BALLOT ISSUE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  3. MEA-MFT v. Fox (LR 127)Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. CITY OF LAS VEGAS v. LAS VEGAS POLICE PROT. ASS'N.Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Nevadans for Reprod. Freedom v. WashingtonNevada Supreme Court · 2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API