Education Initiative PAC v. Committee to Protect Nevada Jobs
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Hardesty, J.:
In this appeal, we consider the proper standard of review to be applied when reviewing the adequacy of a ballot initiative’s description of effect. Nevada’s Constitution permits the Legislature to provide procedures to facilitate the initiative process. In 2005, the Legislature enacted NRS 295.009(l)(b), which requires a ballot initiative to provide in 200 words or less a description of the effect of the initiative. A description of effect serves a limited purpose to facilitate the initiative process, and to that end, it must be a straightforward, succinct,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Campbell v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Herbst Gaming, Inc. v. Sec'y of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Stumpf v. LauNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Nevadans for Nevada v. BeersNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Nevada Judges Ass'n v. LauNevada Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- ED. FREEDOM PAC v. REID (BALLOT ISSUE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
- HELTON v. NEV. VOTERS FIRST PAC (BALLOT ISSUE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
- MEA-MFT v. Fox (LR 127)Montana Supreme Court · 2014
- CITY OF LAS VEGAS v. LAS VEGAS POLICE PROT. ASS'N.Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
- Nevadans for Reprod. Freedom v. WashingtonNevada Supreme Court · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.