Legal Opinion
Poole v. Target Corporation
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided July 27, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00014Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION KEENA POOLE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:20-cv-00014 TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending is Defendant, Target Corporation’s (“Target”), Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff has filed a response to the Motion, and the time for filing a reply memorandum has expired. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Compel as indicated below. Target complains that Plaintiff failed to provide full and complete responses to Interrogatory numbers 3, 5, 6, 7,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- Jayne H. Lee, Inc. v. Flagstaff Industries Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1998
- B. Braun Medical Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.