Hudson v. Hudson

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in awarding plaintiff attorney fees for legal services rendered on her behalf and on behalf of the children. This case involves actions for alimony, child custody and support, bringing it within the ambit of N.C.G.S. 50-13.6.

• Defendant contends this is not an action for custody and support because the court entered a consent order on the question of *649custody of the children before trial. The initiation of the action for the custody of the children placed the custody and welfare of the children with…