Legal Opinion

City of Tallmadge v. DeGraft-Biney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1988No. 87-417PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The issue certified herein is whether a jury demand pursuant to Crim. R. 23(A) is timely filed when it is filed not less than ten days before the actual trial (after continuance of the trial date), even though a jury demand had not been filed at least ten days before the originally scheduled trial date. We hold that in such an event the jury demand has been timely filed. ,

-Crim. R. 23(A) provides in pertinent part:

“* * * In petty offense cases, where there is a right of jury trial, the defendant shall be tried by the court unless he demands a jury trial. Such demand must be in writing and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. GerberNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. GrimsleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. WilcoxsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. City of Dayton v. DrakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. GlaspyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API