Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1997No. 16261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Kenneth T. Scott appeals from his conviction and sentence, following a bench trial, for disturbing the peace and for disorderly conduct, in violation of the codified ordinances of the city of Kettering, Ohio. Scott contends that the trial court erred in denying him the right to a jury trial, that the conduct for which he was convicted is protected free speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, and that the trial court erred in denying his request for additional time to prepare for trial.

We conclude that there is evidence in the record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. City of Tallmadge v. DeGraft-BineyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GlaspyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API