Legal Opinion

City of Pierce v. Schramm

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1927No. 25861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The City of Pierce, situate in the county of Pierce, instituted this action to have the defendant Schramm enjoined from maintaining and operating certain gasoline pumps by him constructed and operated between the graded portion of the street and his lot line, to have such construction declared a nuisance and ordered removed. After the issues were duly joined and evidence submitted, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff as prayed. Defendant appeals.

The action is before us for trial de novo. This being a suit in equity, equitable principles must control our consideration of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chapman v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Kenney v. Village of DorchesterNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. McCraney v. City of LeedsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Michelsen v. DwyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State ex rel. Andruss v. Mayor of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Coulthard v. Board of AdjustmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API