Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ex Parte Goodbread

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1998No. 1466-95Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBaird, Judge

In this case, applicant seeks to have 13 indictments, all of which charge him with the offense of aggravated sexual assault, dismissed on jeopardy grounds. While I agree the alleged sexual assaults by digital penetration are not jeopardy barred, I do believe the alleged sexual assaults by intercourse or oral sex are jeopardy barred. Therefore, I concur in part and dissent in part to the judgment of the Court.

I. The Facts

On January 27, 1995, appellant was indicted in a two-paragraph indictment for the offense of aggravated sexual assault in Cause No. 685297. The first paragraph alleged an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sledge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API