Felt v. Olson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*979OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Especially since here the maker and the payee were already deceased at the time of the trial (see Schechter v Klanfer, 28 NY2d 228), on the record made here whether the notes were signed by Conrad Olson, whether he received consideration for their execution and delivery, and whether they had been paid were questions of fact.
So too was it for the Judge at nisi prius, as the trier of the facts in this non jury case, to decide what weight, if any, was to be accorded to the opinion expressed by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schechter v. KlanferNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- In Re the Estate of SylvestriNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by43 opinions
- Halvorsen v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- De Luca v. KamerosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Dyckman v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- McLamb v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Lelekakis v. KamamisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.