Legal Opinion

Wehringer v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1983PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), *690order affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff has not stated a cause of action in either prima facie tort (see ATI, Inc. v Ruder & Finn, 42 NY2d 454) or intentional infliction of mental distress (Fischer v Maloney, 43 NY2d 553).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fischer v. MaloneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. ATI, Inc. v. Ruder & Finn, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Merritt Hill Vineyards Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Koster v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. Incorporated Village of Freeport v. Jefferson Indoor Marina, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Simpson v. Term Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API