Dawson v. Parsons

I think this motion presents practically the same question as was passed upon in this case by the Special Term upon a former motion, where the court denied an application to direct the receiver to make certain payments under the judgment appealed from.

It is true that the former motion was not made on behalf of creditors, but on behalf of one of the members ,of the firm of Weed, Parsons & Go., but in Mr. Justice Herrick’s opinion, written on the denial of that motion, he says: “ While an appeal is pending from a judgment * * * it hardly seems to me the proper thing to direct the receiver to…