Attorney-General v. North America Life Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from order of General Term of the Supreme Court, in the third judicial department, dismissing an appeal on the part of certain policy-holders from an order confirm- • ing the actuary’s report heroin.
Read the full summary
Appeal from order of General Term of the Supreme Court, in the third judicial department, dismissing an appeal on the part of certain policy-holders from an order confirm- • ing the actuary’s report heroin. (Reported below, 15 Hun, 18.) • The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion. ■ In this proceeding the parties are the People as plaintiff and Insurance Company as defendant, and any interested persons allowed to intervene jpro interesse suo, by an order of the court; the receiver does not hold any such status, as will permit him to make motions or interfere in the litigation between the…
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
By an order of the Special Term of April 24, 1877, liberty was given to Barnes & Hanover, to appear in behalf of Violetta A. Bedell, a policy-holder in the North America Insurance Company, and any person similarly situated, in all motions and proceedings in this action, and the order provided that notices of all motions and proceedings in this action in court on the part of the attorney-general or of the receiver of the corporation, be served upon said firm. Prior to the making of this order, and on the. 8th of March, 1877, a receiver of the company had been appointed upon the application of…
2Cited by12 opinions
- People Ex Rel. New York Edison Co. v. WillcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Des Moines National Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Ryder v. Cue Car Rental, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Posen v. CowdinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.