Legal Opinion

City of Medina v. Skinner

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 3, 2014No. 71157-1-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Skinner appeals the trial court’s order granting the City a statutory writ of review to challenge the award of back pay by the Medina Civil Service Commission. He argues that the City was not entitled to seek a statutory writ of review. Although the City did not apply for a constitutional writ of review, Skinner preemptively argues that the City was not entitled to one. The City stipulated at oral argument that if a constitutional writ of review rather than a statutory writ of review was available, the appeal should be resolved as if a constitutional writ of review had been sought. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Federal Way School District No. 210 v. VinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Medina v. SkinnerWashington Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API