Farrow v. Railway Conductors' Co-operative Protective Ass'n
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Assumpsit by Guy N. Farrow against the Railway Conductors’ Co-operative Protective Association. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
Plaintiff is a resident of the State of Washington; defendant is a Michigan corporation. Defendant’s predecessor in business issued a policy to plaintiff in June, 1908, upon which suit was begun in the State of Washington, in the county of Spokane, in the superior court, in April, 1910. Such proceedings were had in that court and cause that on November 4, 1910, plaintiff recovered therein a judgment against defendant’s .predecessor in business for $500 damages and $50 costs. Upon that judgment, in July, 1911, this suit was begun in the circuit court for the county of Wayne, Mich., was tried…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Brown v. Fletcher's EstateSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cooper v. NewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
- Marshall v. R. M. Owen & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. DiGiovanniMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Delph v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Smithman v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Ohio Department of Taxation v. Kleitch Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Waltemeyer v. StognerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.