Legal Opinion

Dunjo Land Co. v. Hested Stores Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1973No. 12532PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

Defendants appeal from the granting of summary judgment for plaintiff in an action for damages founded on the provisions of a lease.

Prom admissions contained in the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts, the district court of the thirteenth judicial district, Yellowstone County, found these facts: That on September 11, 1959, defendant Hested Stores Company, the predecessor in interest to defendant J. J. Newberry Co., entered into a lease with plaintiff Dunjo Land Company’s predecessor in interest. Laurel Security Company. The lease term commenced on October 1, 1959. The lease provided in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Henderson v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mustang Beverage Co., Inc. v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Guidici v. Minerals Engineering CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Security Bank v. Vander PasMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Baylor v. JacobsonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Dambrowski v. Champion International Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Walters v. GetterMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Flanagan v. CurranMontana Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API