Gorman v. Carpenters' & Millwrights' Health Benefit Trust Fund
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, District Judge.
Defendant/appellant Carpenters’ and Millwrights’ Health Benefit Trust Fund (the Fund) appeals from the district court’s Order on Motions for Summary Judgment granting plaintiff/appellee Paul Gorman (Plaintiff) equitable relief from the terms of a subrogation contract on the grounds that the Fund acted arbitrarily and capriciously because its contract imposed a condition on Plaintiff that was not contained in the Plan or the Summary Plan Description. The new condition was that the Plaintiff must file a third-party action at his own expense in order to obtain his vested…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Tele-Communications, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Shefton Gordon v. United States Steel Corporation, United States Steel and Carnegie Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Rachel v. TrouttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States Ex Rel. Ritchie v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Primax Recoveries, Inc. v. Joan Gunter and William GunterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Atwood v. Swire Coca-Cola, USADistrict Court, D. Utah · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.