Legal Opinion

Nesbitt v. Town of Poughkeepsie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. “A landowner has a duty to maintain its premises in a reasonably safe manner” (Capasso v Village of Goshen, 84 AD3d 998, 999 [2011] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233 [1976]; Russ v Fried, 73 AD3d 1153, 1154 [2010]). “However, there is no duty to protect or warn against an open and obvious condition which, as a matter of law, is not inherently dangerous” (Capasso v Village of Goshen, 84 AD3d at 999 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Russ v Fried, 73…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Cupo v. KarfunkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Tagle v. JakobNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Gibbons v. LidoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Capasso v. Village of GoshenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gerner v. Shop-Rite of Uniondale, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API