Nesbitt v. Town of Poughkeepsie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. “A landowner has a duty to maintain its premises in a reasonably safe manner” (Capasso v Village of Goshen, 84 AD3d 998, 999 [2011] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Basso v Miller, 40 NY2d 233 [1976]; Russ v Fried, 73 AD3d 1153, 1154 [2010]). “However, there is no duty to protect or warn against an open and obvious condition which, as a matter of law, is not inherently dangerous” (Capasso v Village of Goshen, 84 AD3d at 999 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Russ v Fried, 73…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cupo v. KarfunkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Tagle v. JakobNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Gibbons v. LidoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Capasso v. Village of GoshenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gerner v. Shop-Rite of Uniondale, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017