Legal Opinion

Witteman v. Dunkle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1969No. 69-11PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

The first question raised is whether a devise of “all * * * my real property” to named individuals represents a specific devise of that property to them within the meaning of Section 2113.38, Revised Code.

A specific devise may be defined as a devise of part or all of or an interest in some particular real estate described by the will so as to identify it from real estate generally. See In re Estate of Mellott (1954), 162 Ohio St. 113, 121 N. E. 2d 7, defining a specific legacy.

Also, it may be that a so-called demonstrative legacy will result in creating what amounts to a specific devise, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lincoln Properties, Inc. v. GoldslagerOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re Estate of WittemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burns v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. DiCristofaro v. BeaudrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  3. Berger v. BergerCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1973
  4. Chambers v. BockmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API