Legal Opinion

McKay v. Broad

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Madison. Heard before the Hon. II. O. Speake. cited Parlmian v. Aicardi <& Toole, 34 Ala. 393.

1Opinion of the CourtBliICKELL, C. J.

The original bill was filed by Broad, as administrator of Simeon Lemley, deceased, to enforce specific performance of a contract for the purchase of lands, into which the intestate had entered with one Stnddart, and of which there had been by the intestate full performance during his life; and to restrain the appellants, John T. and Daniel B. McKay, 'from trespassing and committing waste upon the lands. On a motion to dismiss the bill for want of equity, the chancellor required that it should be amended, by joining the heirs of the intestate as complainants; and an amendment was thereupon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pearson v. DarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Burns v. Hamilton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  3. Parkman's Adm'r v. Aicardi & ToolSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. State ex rel. Nabor's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  5. Jordan v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Griffin v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Rucker v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Winn v. FitzwaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Jones v. Woodstock Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Ex Parte ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API