Legal Opinion

Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 3, 2015No. Case No. 13-cv-03717-NCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 53, 63, 66

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge

The Endangered Species Act makes it unlawful for any person to “take” members of an endangered or threatened species. There is an exception: a person may obtain a permit to take a species, if such taking is incidental to the proposed activity and the applicant presents plans to minimize and mitigate its impact. Here, the primary issue is whether or not a permit applicant should be allowed to piggyback off of the conservation work of a non-applicant neighbor.

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Friends of the River v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
  3. State of Alaska v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API