Legal Opinion

Western Express, Inc. v. Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 27, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

This appeal raises the question of whether Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-37-110(d) requires an insurer of personal property to notify lien-holders that the coverage has been cancelled before the cancellation is effective as to the property owner. We affirm the chancellor’s decision resolving the question against the property owner.

I

Western Express is in the trucking business. On August 28, 1993 Western obtained insurance coverage on its tractor-trailers through Interested Underwriters at Lloyd’s London. The policy contained the names of a bank and an individual as additional loss…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Szymczak v. Midwest Premium Finance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Bryce v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blurton v. Grange Insurance & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  2. Alexander v. AIG Agency Auto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
  3. Auto Now Acceptance Corp. v. Catawba InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. SDBT Archives LLC v. Penn-Star Insurance Company and BGA Finance Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API