Legal Opinion

Timmons v. Schreiber

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided June 2, 2025No. 3:24-cv-03024Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION DAVID PAUL TIMMONS, 3:24-CV-03024-RAL Plaintiff, Vs. 1915 SCREENING ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT BRAD SCHREIBER, in his individual and official capacity; ESTATE OF BRAD SCHREIBER; and THE SCHREIBER LAW FIRM, PROF. L.L.C., Defendants. Plaintiff David Paul Timmons an inmate at the Mike Durfee State Prison filed a pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.’ Doc. 1. This Court granted Timmons’ motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and he timely paid his filing fee. Doc. 6. This Court now screens Timmons’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API