Legal Opinion

Enright v. Hartsig

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Macomb. Case. Defendant brmgs error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Hartsig obtained judgment against Enright before a justice of the peace in Macomb county for overflowing his lands by stopping up a ditch that had been dug many years before by plaintiff and previous owners of the adjacent lands by common consent, and used ever since. The case was appealed to the circuit court where he prevailed again. It is now brought up on error.

An objection is made to the declaration as not full enough.* We think it contains every substantial allegation *471necessary to show tbe plaintiff’s cause of action, and that the objection has no force. If demurred to it could only…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gloeser v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Curtis v. DinneenSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1886
  3. Withey v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Long v. PruynMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Plantenga v. Grand Rapids Terminal Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API