Legal Opinion
Broadnax v. United States
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided March 31, 2025No. 1:22-cv-00437Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD RODNEY BROADNAX, et al, Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:22-cv-00437 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is Tyrone Eugene Copening’s pro se motion to intervene, brought under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 70. For the reasons explained below, the motion is DENIED. At all relevant times, Copening was an inmate of Federal Correctional Institution McDowell. He seeks to intervene in a lawsuit brought on October 6,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.