Legal Opinion
Hutton v. McDaniel
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 28, 2017No. CV-17-00727-PHX-JATPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
James A. Teilborg, Senior United States District Judge
Pending before the Court are Nominal Defendant Inventure Foods, Inc. (“Inven-ture”) and Defendants Terry McDaniel, Steve Weinberger, Timothy A. Cole, Ash-ton D. Asensio, Macon Bryce Edmonson, Paul J. Lapadat, Harold S. Edwards, David L. Meyers, and Itzhak Reichman’s (the “Individual Defendants’”) Motion to Dismiss Shareholder Derivative Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss,” Doc. 33 at 1-24), an alternative Motion to Stay, (id. at 24-26), and Request for Judicial Notice, (“Request,” Doc. 34). Plaintiff Robert Hutton has filed a response to…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Danaher Corporation Shareholder Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Sadideen v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Strojnik v. State Bar of ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020