Young v. Southern Pac. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
These appellees belong to the class of stockholders who sought to intervene in a stockholders’ action and who are referred to in Southern Pacific Co. v. Bogert, 250 U. S. 483, 39 S. Ct. 533, 63 L. Ed. 1099, and Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co. (C. C. A.) 290 F. 727, certiorari denied 263 U. S. 708, 44 S. Ct. 36, 68 L. Ed. 517.
In 1888, the Houston & Texas Central Railroad Company was organized and new securities issued. The appellees, seeking to impress a trust upon a portion of the stock issued by the new Houston & Texas Central Railway Company which reached the hands of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Union Rolling Mill Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Barrett v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Frances Kern v. Txo Production CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Phyllis Zagano v. Fordham University and George N. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Nannette B. Davis v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- HOME OWNERS'LOAN CORPORATION v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Jones v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.