Legal Opinion

Russell v. Huizenga

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 5, 2001No. 00-35284; D.C. No. CV-99-01070-RSLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Thomas Dean Russell appeals the district court’s grant of defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his negligence claim against American Seafoods Corporation.

Russell challenges the district court’s holding that collateral estoppel barred him from relitigating factual issues previously decided in proceedings before an administrative law judge. On this issue, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Russell also contends that the district court’s grant of defendant’s summary judgment on Russell’s negligence claim denied him his constitutional right to a jury trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Diane Russell v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Diane Russell v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., Underwriters at Lloyds and Steamship Mutual Underwriting AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API