Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Wausau Insurance Companies

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1987No. 499, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEANT, Judge.

Appellant, Wayne Christensen, alleges that on 5 March 1984 he was seriously injured when hit by a vehicle driven by Gerd W. Herrmann. The Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund (MAIF), Herrmann’s insurer, paid Christensen $20,000 in settlement, the maximum available under Herrmann’s policy.

Christensen, alleging that his damages exceed the amount paid to him by MAIF, turned to his insurer, appellee (Wausau), to make up the difference. In appellant’s policy is the mandatory “uninsured motorist” (UM) coverage along with another endorsement called “underinsured motorist” (UIM) coverage.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elovich v. Nationwide InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Simonette v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Ebert v. Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Marcolini v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Orkin v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SourasCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. BraggCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Sparwasser v. Federal Kemper InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
  4. Colonial Insurance Co. of California v. BatsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API