In re Tremaine C.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The respondent father appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his minor son, Tremaine. On appeal, the respondent1 claims that his constitutional due process rights to be present at trial and to confront witnesses were violated.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the respondent’s appeal. Trem-aine was bom in June, 2006. The respondent was incarcerated at the time of Tremaine’s birth, and the child was removed from the mother’s care when he…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. AnonymousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- In Re Juvenile AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DicksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- In re Devon W.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- In re Jason M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Lewis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. DicksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016