Legal Opinion

Chrysler Corp. v. Haden Uniking Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 1, 1994No. 91 C 20326PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REINHARD, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

International Insurance Company (International) filed a “COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION” seeking to intervene either as a matter of right, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a)(2), or permissively, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(b)(2), in this action brought by Chrysler Corporation (Chrysler) against Haden Uniking Corporation (Haden Uniking). International seeks to intervene as the excess liability insurer of Haden Uniking to “interest liability and/or minimize the damages” against Haden Unik-ing in this action.

FACTS

Originally, Bartolo Fresco filed a personal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc., Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Intervener-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Robert Shea v. Geraldo Angulo, Hassan Namazee, First Capital Partners, Appeal Of: Donald ButzenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. Davila v. ArlaskyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  4. Campbell v. PlankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ross v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Dyer v. Norfolk Southern Railway CoDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
  3. In Re: RossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API