Dieca Communications, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commission
District Court, N.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MERITS
HINKLE, Chief Judge.
This is a challenge to a decision of the Florida Public Service Commission based on alternative holdings first, that it has no authority to enforce the federal statute setting forth the terms on which a Bell Operating Company may enter the market for interLATA services, and second, that in any event, that statute does not require a Bell Operating Company to allow competitors unbundled access to the high frequency portion of a local loop. I uphold the Florida Commission’s decision on both grounds.
I
Background — The Statutory Framework
Historically, telephone…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Verizon New England, Inc. v. Maine Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- Qwest Corp. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
- Southwestern Bell Telephone v. NuVox Communications of MissouCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008