Legal Opinion
Diamond Asphalt Corp. v. Sander
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Helen E. Freedman, J.
These two CPLR article 78 proceedings, which raise identical issues of law, are consolidated for joint determination.1
Petitioners are unsuccessful bidders for street repair and reconstruction contracts with the City of New York Department of Transportation (DOT). They seek an order annulling the award by the municipal respondents2 (collectively, the City respondents) of the contracts to other businesses, and directing *882the City to award the contracts to petitioners, on the ground that the City’s bid selection procedure violates General Municipal Law §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Estimate of City of New York v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- American Home Assurance Co. v. International InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- HHM Associates, Inc. v. AppletonNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Seabury Construction Corp. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionNew York Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Diamond Asphalt Corp. v. SanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- General Contractors Ass'n of New York, Inc. v. TormentaNew York Supreme Court · 1999