Legal Opinion
Young v. City of Claremore, Okla.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided October 6, 2005No. 4:03-cv-00876PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KERN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 47), filed June 10, 2005. The .Court allowed Plaintiff numerous extensions to respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judg ment, and Plaintiff filed his response on August 4, 2005. 1 On September 12, 2005, after already granting several extensions of time, the Court allowed Plaintiff to supplement his response brief, which was not in compliance with the rules of this Court or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs supplemental submissions are still not in compliance with the rules of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pruett v. ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Trujillo v. Rio Arriba County ex rel. Rio Arriba County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Romero ex rel. Romero v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Rigler v. LampertDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2017
- Dick v. City and Borough of SitkaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.