Legal Opinion
Khaligh v. Hadaegh (In re Khaligh)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 8, 2007No. 06-55361PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Shahzad Khaligh appeals the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, which affirmed the bankruptcy court’s determination that Fred Hadaegh’s award of damages obtained against her was not dischargeable. See 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). She argues that mutual collateral estoppel is not available in California when the prior determination was made in a confirmed arbitration award decision.
We disagree and, therefore, affirm for the reasons cogently set forth in the majority opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. See Khaligh v. Hadaegh (In re Khaligh), 338 B.R. 817 (9th Cir.BAP 2006).
AFFIRMED…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Khaligh v. Hadaegh (In Re Khaligh)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3Cited by29 opinions
- Heers v. Parsons (In Re Heers)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In re: Frances Elizabeth PassUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- In Re SillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Findley v. State Bar (In Re Findley)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Herbert v. Davies (In re Davies)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.