Findley v. State Bar (In Re Findley)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The issue is whether California’s 2003 amendment of its Business and Professions Code (“Bus. & Prof.Code”) § 6086.10 designating attorney discipline cost awards as “penalties” legislatively reversed the result of the Ninth Circuit decision in State Bar v. Tagart (In re Taggart), 249 F.3d 987 (9th Cir.2001). The Taggart decision established that such awards are compensatory in nature and, thus, not excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7) as penalties that are not compensation for actual pecuniary loss. Construing the 2003 amendment as superseding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Khaligh v. Hadaegh (In Re Khaligh)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In Re Attorney Discipline SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ryan v. United States (In Re Ryan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ryan v. United States (In Re Ryan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008