Legal Opinion
Frick Co. v. Rubel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 23, 1933No. 147PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff is a manufacturer of ice-making machinery, which it installs on the buyer’s premises. It signed three contracts with the defendant to make and install such machinery, and performed them; the first cause of action was to recover the contract price. The second and third causes of action demand liquidated damages for the defendant’s delays in accepting delivery of the apparatus. The only issues on the first cause of action are as to certain breaches of warranty by the seller, upon which the defendant filed a counterclaim. At the end of the ease the judge…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Kothe v. R. C. Taylor TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Wise v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Brigg v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DAR & Associates, Inc. v. Uniforce Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Southwest Engineering Company, a Missouri Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- In Re Lion Overall Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. S. T. G. Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Frick Co. v. Rubel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.