Legal Opinion

Pinnell v. Jacobs

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1994No. 63402PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANE, Presiding Judge.

Defendants Herbert and Ruth Jacobs appeal a judgment against them for damages resulting from their removal of a fence and trees located on property which the trial court found to have been acquired by plaintiffs, James and Barbara Pinnell, by adverse possession. On appeal Herbert and Ruth Jacobs contend that the trial court’s damage award was against the weight of the evidence because the evidence supported their equitable estoppel defense. We affirm.

This appeal arises from an action seeking to quiet title and for other relief relating to the east and west boundary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Lake Saint Louis Community Ass'n v. Ravenwood Properties, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Behen v. ElliottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Luketich v. Goedecke, Wood & Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shores v. Express Lending Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Blake v. IrwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Harris v. LynchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Ortmann v. Dace Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Gibson v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API