Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 2002No. 27036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLansing, J.

The State appeals from the order of the district court granting defendant Leon Howell a new trial based on the erroneous admission of hearsay evidence at the original trial. Because we conclude that most of the evidence in question was admissible and that any error was harmless, we reverse the order granting a new trial.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Howell was charged with two counts of lewd conduct with a minor under the age of sixteen, Idaho Code § 18-1508, and one count of attempted lewd conduct with a minor, I.C. §§ 18-1508 and -306, based on allegations by his twelve-year-old…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. ScrogginsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Giles v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. CantuIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LePageIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Paulk v. KempfDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API