Legal Opinion

Ware v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Claimant requested and was granted a hearing in which he protested a denial of his claim for compensation based upon an alleged disabling occupational disease. The hearing officer found as a fact that claimant was not suffering from a compensable occupational disease.

Instead of “an appeal to the medical board of review under ORS 656.808 et seq,” claimant appealed directly to the circuit court, purportedly under ORS 656.810(4). The defendant filed a timely motion to dismiss in the circuit court as contemplated by Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood, Co., 255 Or 503, 469 P2d 25 (1970), in which the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Johnson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society v. BonhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Billings v. CrouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Court v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API