Legal Opinion

Kumar v. American Transit Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages incurred as the result of alleged acts of bad faith by defendant, the insurer of plaintiffs’ assignor, in refusing to settle the underlying personal injury action. Defendant appeals from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the complaint. Contrary to defendant’s contention, an action seeking damages for an insurer’s bad faith refusal to settle an underlying action may be resolved by a motion for summary judgment (see e.g. Lavaud v Country-Wide Ins. Co., 29 AD3d *1450745 [2006]; Little Princess Express Cab…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Lavaud v. Country-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doherty v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Doherty v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API