Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doherty v. Merchants Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 2010Published

1Dissent

Centra and Carni, JJ. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent and begin our analysis with the well-settled proposition that a jury question exists in most cases where the issue is whether an insurer’s good faith obligation has been met (see 2 NY PJI2d 4:67, at 1016 [2010]). Bad faith is generally proven by evidence largely circumstantial in nature (see Cappano v Phoenix Assur. Co. of N.Y, 28 AD2d 639 [1967]). Like many other actions involving bad faith, it is a rare occasion to uncover a “smoking gun” and instead the proof of these cases requires the careful and collective evaluation of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Knobloch v. Royal Globe InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Reifenstein v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Cappano v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  5. State v. Merchants InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API