Legal Opinion

Matlock v. Matlock

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1991No. 17089PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Presiding Judge.

Marie Matlock (Marie) 1 brought an action by which she sought a declaration that certain real estate was subject to a resulting trust or a constructive trust for her benefit. The record owners of the interest in the real estate that appellant contends should be declared as being held subject to a resulting trust or a constructive trust are Joe C. Matlock (Joe) and Christi L. Matlock (Christi), Marie’s son and daughter-in-law. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Joe and Christi, thereby denying the requested relief. This court affirms.

Marie had lived in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Trenton Trust Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Iota Management Corp. v. Boulevard Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Pizzo v. PizzoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Chmieleski v. City Products Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Stratton v. StrattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. Fix v. FixSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. DrewMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Dayton Construction, Inc. v. MeinhardtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. VNA Plus, Inc. v. Apria Healthcare Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API