Matlock v. Matlock
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Presiding Judge.
Marie Matlock (Marie) 1 brought an action by which she sought a declaration that certain real estate was subject to a resulting trust or a constructive trust for her benefit. The record owners of the interest in the real estate that appellant contends should be declared as being held subject to a resulting trust or a constructive trust are Joe C. Matlock (Joe) and Christi L. Matlock (Christi), Marie’s son and daughter-in-law. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Joe and Christi, thereby denying the requested relief. This court affirms.
Marie had lived in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Trenton Trust Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Iota Management Corp. v. Boulevard Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Pizzo v. PizzoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Chmieleski v. City Products Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Stratton v. StrattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Fix v. FixSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. DrewMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dayton Construction, Inc. v. MeinhardtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- VNA Plus, Inc. v. Apria Healthcare Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.