Legal Opinion

People v. Seely (1944)

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1944No. Crim. 3799PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Appellant and his codefendant were accused of violating section 11160, Health and Safety Code, by having in their possession flowering tops and leaves of Indian Hemp, scientifically classified as cannabis sativa and familiarly known as marihuana. They were convicted by a jury. Prom the judgment sentencing him to serve a year in the county jail Rumsey appealed on the following grounds:(1) Inefficiency of the pleading, (2) insufficiency of the evidence, (3) errors in the admission of certain testimony, (4) errors in the giving of certain instructions, and (5) the violation of public policy in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  3. Saunders v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. People v. EpsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. FinkelstinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. MitmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. HutchersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API